<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Transport Central &#187; Train Operating Co&#8217;s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.transportcentral.co.uk/category/rail/train-operating-companies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.transportcentral.co.uk</link>
	<description>Opinion, Facts, Ideas and Discussion About All Things Transport</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Aug 2011 12:33:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>West Coast Mainline Update</title>
		<link>http://www.transportcentral.co.uk/rail/west-coast-mainline-update/</link>
		<comments>http://www.transportcentral.co.uk/rail/west-coast-mainline-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 00:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Speed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Train Operating Co's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virgin Trains]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.transportcentral.co.uk/?p=122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It all started on Sunday evening. The wires came down onto the track at Watford Junction causing all kinds of issues &#8211; every single train in and out of London Euston was cancelled. As I personally travelled on Sunday evening, I was witness to a complete lack of information and problems all over the railway [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It all started on Sunday evening. The wires came down onto the track at Watford Junction causing all kinds of issues &#8211; every single train in and out of London Euston was cancelled. As I personally travelled on Sunday evening, I was witness to a complete lack of information and problems all over the railway network. Passengers were being diverted to London Marylebone to catch the train to Birmingham Moor Street and change there.</p>
<p>The Chiltern service connects reasonably well at both Banbury and Leamington Spa to CrossCountry&#8217;s Birmingham New Street and Manchester Picadilly service thus preventing the need for the walk from Birmingham Moor Street and New Street in sub-zero temperatures. This, was not mentioned however. There were delays en-route due to a trespasser on the line on the Chiltern route and big delays on the route via Coventry due to a cracked rail. </p>
<p><span id="more-122"></span>Now, a personal tip for passengers out there. Sometimes when things are going badly train operators put on special services to try to assist in getting people home. If you are on a different train operator&#8217;s train other than the one that is running the special service the existence of this will not be announced to you &#8211; you have to physically check the departure boards at stations. This happened to me while I was being diverted via Manchester on CrossCountry even though there was a direct train to my destination just a few minutes behind the service I was on.</p>
<p>The problems with the West Coast Mainline (WCML) seem to have gotten worse with issues at Bletchley, Rugby and now Wembley affecting also the Overground between London Euston and Watford Junction and the Bakerloo line is partly suspended as well. There are <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article5469285.ece">now genuine doubts</a> about the ability of Virgin Trains to run its new enhanced Very High Frequency (VHF) service. Indeed, there have now been <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/jan/08/transport-rail-power-failure-euston">five days of disruption</a> on the line which does nothing to improve the image of rail as a quick and reliable mode of transport.</p>
<p>An accusation has been leveled at Network Rail by the British Chambers of Commerce (BCC) that, &#8220;the recent setbacks had occurred because the £9bn upgrade to the West Coast main line had been done in haste in order that it could be completed by the end of 2008.&#8221; It has been reported that <a href="http://www.theherald.co.uk/news/news/display.var.2479978.0.West_Coast_rail_route_disruption_caused_by_rush_to_upgrade_line.php">the disruption has &#8216;cost&#8217; businesses £38m</a>. </p>
<p>Of course, with the recent inflation busting fare increases, passengers will not be feeling like giving an awful lot of goodwill to the train companies or Network Rail, especially with the all <a href="http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/transport/article5425815.ece">the buggering about train companies do with peak ticket restrictions now</a>. This is shoddy deception from the published figures and a stop should be put to this.</p>
<p>The fare increases on the WCML should be postponed until mid-year as compensation for all, including those that followed advice from National Rail Enquiries not to travel unless absolutely necessary. </p>
<ul>
<li>Virgin expects to run a normal train service on Thursday 8th January 2009.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.transportcentral.co.uk/rail/west-coast-mainline-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ban of Alcohol Consumption on Tube &#8211; 1 June</title>
		<link>http://www.transportcentral.co.uk/rail/ban-of-alcohol-consumption-on-tube-1-june/</link>
		<comments>http://www.transportcentral.co.uk/rail/ban-of-alcohol-consumption-on-tube-1-june/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 23:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London Underground]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rail]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.transportcentral.co.uk/?p=49</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Newly elected London Mayor, Boris Johnson, announced the implementation of one of the key pledges of his election manifesto yesterday, for which London voted for by a majority of approximately 140,000 combined preference votes. It has, however, come under a sustained attack from unions fearing that their members will have to approach members of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Newly elected London Mayor, Boris Johnson, announced the implementation of one of the key pledges of his election manifesto yesterday, for which London voted for by a majority of approximately 140,000 combined preference votes. It has, however, come under a sustained attack from unions fearing that their members will have to approach members of the public consuming alcohol to have to deal with it.</p>
<p>There will be no powers to deal with the incident until the Conditions of Carriage for London transport have been amended, a process which will take about a year according to <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article3890097.ece" target="_blank">The Times</a> in a news article released this evening. There will, reportedly, not be regular patrols of carriages by Transport for London or British Transport Police officials but there will be the recruitment of 440 community support officers to assist with any disorder related incidents.</p>
<p><span id="more-49"></span></p>
<p>Bob Crow of the RMT reportedly singled out &#8220;Liverpool supporters&#8221; as being particular examples of people whom their staff would not want to face on the train whilst consuming alcohol. Having been to London many times at weekends, we at Transport Central wonder why Bob Crow has chosen this rather out-dated stereotype to attempt to bolster his rather shaky argument.</p>
<p>The response is of, however, no surprise and the union will be feeling particularly strike-happy at the moment with many planned Tube strikes in recent past &#8211; the majority of which having being called off. It is noticed that these Tube strikes are often planned at times, such as New Year, to affect the most possible numbers of leisure and business travelers.</p>
<p>However, Mr Johnson said, &#8220;I firmly believe that if we drive out so-called minor crime    then we will be able to get a firm grip on more serious crime. That&#8217;s why from 1 June the drinking of alcohol will be banned from the tube,    tram, bus, and Docklands Light Railway.&#8221; The mayor received support from the London transport commissioner who said, &#8220;I am sure that cutting out boozing on public transport will be    welcomed by our passengers and staff.&#8221;</p>
<p>The response from unions seems all the more strange when set in the national context where the consumption of alcohol on buses and coaches is already frowned upon culturally and staff are expected to deal with such people by dealing with it personally or calling the police if they have any worries about handling such people. The union&#8217;s response does not seem to match the national picture at all &#8211; one policy for London and one policy for the rest.</p>
<p>Boris Johnson did however get a more rational response from the British Transport Police who said, &#8220;From June 1, when the new measures come into effect, officers will engage with people who drink alcohol on the tube and let them know that it is no longer permitted. Most of the time, just letting people know that their behaviour is no longer permitted will be enough to make them stop, but if they become antisocial or aggressive they will be dealt with under current legislation and bylaws.&#8221;</p>
<p>So true. In New York City, from which Boris is drawing some inspiration, alcohol consumption and the carrying of open drinks containers is already banned by their <a href="http://www.mta.info/nyct/rules/index.html" target="_blank">rules of conduct</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.transportcentral.co.uk/rail/ban-of-alcohol-consumption-on-tube-1-june/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>West Coast Main Line News</title>
		<link>http://www.transportcentral.co.uk/rail/west-coast-main-line-modernisation-update/</link>
		<comments>http://www.transportcentral.co.uk/rail/west-coast-main-line-modernisation-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 04:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London Midland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South West Trains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Train Operating Co's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virgin Trains]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.transportcentral.co.uk/?p=48</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Office of Rail Regulation (ORR) has approved the recently unveiled Network Rail delivery plan as detailed in March 2008. The ORR considers the delivery plan sufficiently robust for the completion of the modernisation work by the end of 2008. The aim of the work is to allow the number of services to run to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Office of Rail Regulation (ORR) has approved the recently unveiled Network Rail delivery plan as detailed in March 2008. The ORR considers the delivery plan sufficiently robust for the completion of the modernisation work by the end of 2008. The aim of the work is to allow the number of services to run to increase by 30% and also allow for much improved journey times.</p>
<p>The work is going ahead in the way Network Rail desires despite protests from the Train Operating Companies that use the Main Line for its passenger and freight services. There will be disruption to routes at all bank holidays and most weekends until the end of the year meaning the challenge to passengers and the desirability of traveling via rail will be much reduced.</p>
<p><span id="more-48"></span></p>
<p>Network Rail details a number of benefits which are much welcome if the project succeeds by the end of the year:</p>
<ul>
<li>Increase in two to three trains per hour between London and Manchester Piccadilly,</li>
<li>Increase in two to three trains per hour between London and Birmingham,</li>
<li>A new hourly service between London and Chester and London and Preston.</li>
</ul>
<p>Compared with 2003, there will be journey time improvements of up to approximately an hour for the route from Glasgow Central from 5h06 to 4h10 as well as 46 minutes being shaved off the Liverpool Lime Street-London Euston route, 43 minutes less from Manchester Piccadilly-London Euston and 23 minutes less from Birmingham New Street-London Euston.</p>
<p>The West Coast Main Line is Europe&#8217;s busiest mixed-use railway line so the challenges in upgrading the railway cannot be greater, whilst maintaining at least some of it operationally. It is hoped that Network Rail can deliver its ambitious plan to achieve project success by the end of the year and that they avoid too many slips along the way.</p>
<p>This weekend brought quite a nightmare for passengers as the route into London Euston was closed and there were also replacement bus services on the Chiltern services along the way affecting the only other real alternative route from Birmingham to London for passengers from the midlands and the north west. Added to these woes was a virtual meltdown of the West Coast Main Line again yesterday, 6 May when there was a signal failure at Milton Keynes (again).</p>
<p>The situation that this caused was not pretty with many services cancelled and passengers stranded. A <a title="Signal Failure hits 30,000" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/7385299.stm" target="_blank">BBC News report</a> reported that up to 30,000 people were affected including 600 people stranded on trains for hours. Rail replacement buses replaced trains for the entire 50 mile stretch between Bletchley and London Euston. In yesterday&#8217;s sweltering heat, this cannot have been very pleasant.</p>
<p>The problem struck the network at 9:30am and affected the network until the close of business Tuesday night. Virgin Trains was only able to run three trains per hour after 17:30 compounding the issue. Value Advance ticket holders are being allowed today, 7 May, but are being urged to travel as close to their original ticket time as possible to avoid chronic overcrowding which would delay trains today.</p>
<p>London Midland was also operating a reduced service whilst London Overground was unaffected as it only goes as far as Watford Junction anyway. Other problems on the network included London Liverpool Street being affected by the failure of lineside equipment causing cancellations of trains to Cheshunt, Chingford, Cambridge and Enfield Town and a points failure at Wimbledon during the peak rush hour period affecting South West Trains.</p>
<p>The 6 May was not a day to remember for the British Railways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.transportcentral.co.uk/rail/west-coast-main-line-modernisation-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rail Update &#8211; 6 Apr 2008 &#8211; More Virgin Trains Woes</title>
		<link>http://www.transportcentral.co.uk/rail/rail-update-6-apr-2008-more-virgin-trains-woes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.transportcentral.co.uk/rail/rail-update-6-apr-2008-more-virgin-trains-woes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 11:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Train Operating Co's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virgin Trains]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.transportcentral.co.uk/uncategorized/rail-update-6-apr-2008-more-virgin-trains-woes/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although the overhead line problems affecting the West Coast Main Line have been fixed, there is now another, separate issue affecting the area between Tring and Leighton Buzzard which all Virgin Trains to and from London Euston go through. This is causing delays of up to one hour and the odd cancellation. A quick look [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although the overhead line problems affecting the West Coast Main Line have been fixed, there is now another, separate issue affecting the area between Tring and Leighton Buzzard which all Virgin Trains to and from London Euston go through. This is causing delays of up to one hour and the odd cancellation.</p>
<p>A quick look at the live departure boards reveals that the  London Euston to Liverpool Lime Street 11:07 is currently running an hour late, as is the 11:56 London to Glasgow service. These issues are also affecting London Midland causing delays of up to thirty minutes on some services. Network Rail have no estimate as to when a normal service will be resumed.</p>
<p><span id="more-47"></span><br />
Other problems affecting the railway at the moment are:</p>
<ul>
<li>Over-running engineering works between Slateford and Kirknewton (TOC: National Express East Coast, First ScotRail, CrossCountry) due to be resolved by 3pm.</li>
<li>There was a broken down train between Ascot and Aldershot in the Camberley area (TOC: South West Trains)</li>
</ul>
<p>In addition, there are 41 seperate engineering projects going on this week to add to these problems. For a full list of these you can go to the <a href="http://nationalrail.co.uk/service_disruptions/today.html" target="_blank">National Rail Enquiries</a> website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.transportcentral.co.uk/rail/rail-update-6-apr-2008-more-virgin-trains-woes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rail Update &#8211; 5 Apr 2008 &#8211; Virgin Trains Cancellations</title>
		<link>http://www.transportcentral.co.uk/rail/rail-update-5-apr-2008-virgin-trains-cancellations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.transportcentral.co.uk/rail/rail-update-5-apr-2008-virgin-trains-cancellations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 19:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Train Operating Co's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virgin Trains]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.transportcentral.co.uk/rail/rail-update-5-apr-2008-virgin-trains-cancellations/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A problem which impacted in a big way on the West Coast Mainline today brought misery to many hundreds of passengers waiting at Euston and other stations around the country for their Virgin Trains services. The problem was at Rugby where there has been an overhead line issue. Any other information about this is not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A problem which impacted in a big way on the West Coast Mainline today brought misery to many hundreds of passengers waiting at Euston and other stations around the country for their Virgin Trains services. The problem was at Rugby where there has been an overhead line issue. Any other information about this is not available because the railway industry does not seem to like publishing this strange but amazing thing called information.</p>
<p>However, it has resulted in a large number of delays and cancellations which will affect services until the end of business today. Having a quick look at the London Euston live departure boards shows a number of cancellations into London Euston: 2100 from Wolverhampton, 2120 from Manchester Picadilly, 2122 from Manchester Picadilly, 2201 from Liverpool Lime Street, 2208 from Wolverhampton and the 2228 from Manchester Picadilly.</p>
<p>A Preston to London service has been substantially delayed with an estimated arrival time of 2243 when it should have arrived at 2128.  We can only imagine what the conditions will be like on this train!</p>
<p>Virgin Trains have said that tickets issued for today will be valid on services tomorrow and Monday 7 April.</p>
<p><span id="more-46"></span><br />
Other issues affecting the network today, as well as about fifteen planned engineering works going on:</p>
<ul>
<li>Signalling issues at London Waterloo (TOC: South West Trains) &#8211; full service resumption delayed until 21:30 after an original report of 19:30 stated.</li>
<li>Signalling issues affecting Stanstead Airport (TOC: CrossCountry, National Express East Anglia)</li>
<li>All routes via Cambridge affected due to a security alert (TOC: First Capital Connect, National Express East Anglia, CrossCountry)</li>
<li>Signalling issues in the Clifton area affecting routes between Salford Crescent and Bolton (TOC: Northern Rail, First Transpennine Express)</li>
<li>There was a broken down train in the Sittingbourne area (TOC: Southeastern)</li>
<li>There was a bridge struck in the Cam &amp; Dursley area.</li>
<li>There were signalling issues in the Mill Hill Broadway area affecting routes between Luton and London St. Pancras (TOC: East Midlands Trains, First Capital Connect)</li>
<li>There was a bridge struck in the Ruabon area affecting routes between Chester and Shrewsbury.</li>
<li>There were signalling issues affecting the line between Treherbert and Porth (TOC: Arriva Trains Wales)</li>
</ul>
<p>Additionally, there were a large array of service alterations (which now seem to be referred to as &#8220;Travel Updates&#8221;) on CrossCountry services with a few trains suffering cancellations and delays due to a lack of staff. Some of these automated updates are woefully inadequate at providing decent information; we really need to know more about the situation of these trains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.transportcentral.co.uk/rail/rail-update-5-apr-2008-virgin-trains-cancellations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>South West Trains &#8211; Proposed Industrial Action</title>
		<link>http://www.transportcentral.co.uk/rail/south-west-trains-proposed-industrial-action/</link>
		<comments>http://www.transportcentral.co.uk/rail/south-west-trains-proposed-industrial-action/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 21:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industrial Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South West Trains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Train Operating Co's]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.transportcentral.co.uk/rail/south-west-trains-proposed-industrial-action/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UPDATE: This action has been suspended pending further discussions.  South West Trains are facing industrial action in the form of strikes due to Aslef members voting to reject a 4.5% pay increase. The strike action is planned for four days: 31 March, 1 April, 2 April and 3 April. South West Trains say they have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>UPDATE:</strong> This action has been suspended pending further discussions. </p>
<p>South West Trains are facing industrial action in the form of strikes due to Aslef members voting to reject a 4.5% pay increase. The strike action is planned for four days: 31 March, 1 April, 2 April and 3 April. South West Trains say they have met with the union informally today in an effort to avoid the action.</p>
<p>The company is planning to run a limited service and use replacement bus services for other services where possible. In a statement on its website the company&#8217;s Managing Director, Stewart Palmer, said:</p>
<p><em>“We regret the significant disruption this will cause to our passengers and we reassure them that we will do everything we can to avoid this strike taking place However if they do go ahead we will pull out all the stops to run as many trains and buses as we can.</em></p>
<p><em>“We are very disappointed that ASLEF has taken this decision as we believe that this is a very good offer in the current economic climate.”</em></p>
<p><span id="more-43"></span><br />
The strike action appears to be unconfirmed at this time with <a target="_blank" href="http://www.smeweb.com/economy/news/south-west-trains-jumps-the-gun-over-rail-strike6546.html">one article reporting</a> that Aslef have actually denied wanting to go on strike, although they have held an industrial action ballot and sent a notification of industrial action letter to South West Trains.</p>
<p>The company also plans to use buses from its national bus network from its sister network.</p>
<ul>
<li> <a target="_blank" href="http://www.southwesttrains.co.uk/SWTrains/">South West Trains</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.transportcentral.co.uk/rail/south-west-trains-proposed-industrial-action/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TOC Focus &#8211; London Midland</title>
		<link>http://www.transportcentral.co.uk/rail/toc-focus-london-midland/</link>
		<comments>http://www.transportcentral.co.uk/rail/toc-focus-london-midland/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[London Midland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Train Operating Co's]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.transportcentral.co.uk/rail/toc-focus-london-midland/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[London Midland has gotten off to a relatively good start with a big rise in punctuality over the previous two periods (85% to a shave off 90%) which is something not seen that much under the previous operator. One can see that to be true when travelling on London Midland&#8217;s services as they seem to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>London Midland has gotten off to a relatively good start with a big rise in punctuality over the previous two periods (85% to a shave off 90%) which is something not seen that much under the previous operator. One can see that to be true when travelling on London Midland&#8217;s services as they seem to operate without issues and certainly good things are being said about them in the press.</p>
<p>London Midland is in the process of refurbishing its older trains at the moment with the first trains being rolled out on their West Midlands services (<em>picture from londonmidland.com</em>) over the next six months at the rate of one a week:</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://www.transportcentral.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/londonmidland.jpg" alt="London Midland - New Refurbished Trains" /></p>
<p align="left">These are fairly standard three-car trains and will receive new seat covers, interiors and facilities for people with sight problems. These have also been &#8216;deep cleaned&#8217; so they should be looking nice inside very soon too. Some of the carriages are receiving &#8220;intelligent sensors&#8221; to assist with the counting of passengers and identify overcrowding so something can be done about it. This sounds quite interesting and it will be good to know how well this works.</p>
<p align="left"><span id="more-41"></span></p>
<p align="left">In addition to this there are a large number of other improvements London Midland are making to their franchise. There will be many new trains including thirty seven new four-car Siemens Desiros, twelve two-car Bombardier Turbostars and fifteen three-car Bombardier Turbostars. These are going to be replacing existing trains. These trains will also be fitted with the loading sensors and London Midland say they will alter train formations to allieviate overcrowding where possible.</p>
<p align="left">London Midland are also going to be operating the rather strange looking <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parry_People_Movers">Parry People Mover</a> train on the Stourbridge Line which has received quite a bit of press. This is a welcome innovation that will perhaps see the end of single car diesel trains which are horribly noisy, usually dirty (on many train operator&#8217;s routes) and inefficient in terms of energy use. An overview of the technology can be found on the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.parrypeoplemovers.com/technology.htm">official website</a> for those who are interested. These are environmentally friendly and for less well used lines, they are an obvious choice.</p>
<p align="left">London Midland are investing into other things as well to benefit the travelling public and it is good to see a train operating company being so proactive instead of the usual stagnation &#8211; especially that which has blighted this particular franchise area in the past. There will be station improvements where London Midland is responsible. The most notable feature is their plan to introduce a smart-card technology allowing season ticket automatic renewal and easier ticketing by 2010. National Rail Oyster card anyone? We hope it works better and more transparently than the London one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.transportcentral.co.uk/rail/toc-focus-london-midland/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Duisburg &#8211; Manchester Freight Link</title>
		<link>http://www.transportcentral.co.uk/rail/duisburg-manchester-freight-link/</link>
		<comments>http://www.transportcentral.co.uk/rail/duisburg-manchester-freight-link/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 21:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deutsche Bahn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Train Operating Co's]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.transportcentral.co.uk/rail/duisburg-manchester-freight-link/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RAIL 587 reports that Deutsche Bahn (DB) and EWS, which is owned by Deutsche Bahn since last year, have launched container freight traffic from Duisburg to Manchester using the Channel Tunnel. Deutsche Bahn hauls the trains up to the Tunnel where EWS then takes over and pulls the train into the UK and all the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal"><em><span lang="EN-GB">RAIL 587</span></em><span lang="EN-GB"> reports that Deutsche Bahn (DB) and EWS, which is owned by Deutsche Bahn since last year, have launched container freight traffic from <st1:city w:st="on">Duisburg</st1:city> to <st1:city w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Manchester</st1:place></st1:city> using the Channel Tunnel.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span id="more-38"></span><span lang="EN-GB">Deutsche Bahn hauls the trains up to the Tunnel where EWS then takes over and pulls the train into the <st1:country-region w:st="on">UK</st1:country-region> and all the way up north to <st1:city w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Manchester</st1:place></st1:city>.<o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">According to DB this is the first in a series of rail links between the <st1:country-region w:st="on">UK</st1:country-region> and continental <st1:place w:st="on">Europe</st1:place>. The service started operations on 04 March 2008.<o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">We welcome DB establishing the rail link finally using some of the excess spare capacity of the Channel Tunnel. It would be nice if, in cooperation with other freight and train companies, services like this would be developed as a strong competitor to road and air freight between continental Europe and the <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">UK</st1:place></st1:country-region>.<br />
Not only does this mode of freight bear a much smaller carbon footprint compared to the afore mentioned modes, it also makes use of the available capacity through the Tunnel, which finally could see the Tunnel being made much better use of.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.transportcentral.co.uk/rail/duisburg-manchester-freight-link/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mass Virgin West Coast Cancellations</title>
		<link>http://www.transportcentral.co.uk/rail/mass-virgin-west-coast-cancellations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.transportcentral.co.uk/rail/mass-virgin-west-coast-cancellations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 02:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[East Midlands Trains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Train Operating Co's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virgin Trains]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.transportcentral.co.uk/rail/mass-virgin-west-coast-cancellations/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Due to the severe weather conditions, Virgin Trains have cancelled a large number of services in the morning today. You are advised to check alternative routes if possible or try to squeeze on those few trains still remaining if you must travel today. The following services are cancelled: London Euston to Birmingham New Street: 07:08, 8:10, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Due to the severe weather conditions, Virgin Trains have cancelled a large number of services in the morning today. You are advised to check alternative routes if possible or try to squeeze on those few trains still remaining if you must travel today.</p>
<p>The following services are <strong><font color="#ff0000">cancelled</font></strong>:</p>
<ul>
<li>London Euston to Birmingham New Street: 07:08, 8:10, 9:10, 10:10, 11:10, 12:10</li>
<li>Birmingham New Street to London Euston: 9:00, 10:00, 11:00, 12:00, 13:00, 14:00</li>
<li>London Euston to Manchester Piccadilly: 07:35, 08:35, 9:35, 9:38, 10:35, 11:35</li>
<li>Manchester Piccadilly to London Euston: 08:15, 09:15, 10:15, 11:15, 12:15, 13:15, 14:05, 14:15</li>
</ul>
<p>The following services are expected to suffer problems:</p>
<ul>
<li>London Euston to Liverpool Lime Street: unaffected, delays of up to 60 minutes</li>
<li>Liverpool Lime Street to London Euston: unaffected, delays of up to 60 minutes</li>
<li>London Euston to Scotland routes: unaffected but heavy delays expected</li>
<li>London Euston to and from Holyhead: route unaffected</li>
</ul>
<p>East Midlands Trains&#8217; customers are advised to check the announcement on the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.eastmidlandstrains.co.uk/EMTrains/EngineeringWorks.aspx?NRMODE=Published&amp;NRORIGINALURL=%2fEMTrains%2fTimes%2fAlterations%2ehtm%3fincident%3da0173efd0a04000401ac7dfbe8d3e92120080311231001&amp;NRNODEGUID=%7bE5EBF969-7058-4514-BCA9-982D326D9F82%7d&amp;NRCACHEHINT=NoModifyGuest&amp;incident=9ef8ab980a04000400d015f9af90632920080312011555#">TOC&#8217;s website</a>.</p>
<p>This is due to speed restrictions in force between 9:00 and 14:00 for the following Train Operating Companies: East Midlands Trains, First Capital Connect, First Transpennine Express, Grand Central, London Midland, Virgin Trains.</p>
<p><span id="more-35"></span></p>
<p>There were numerous problems caused by the storm with numerous trees on the line. One CrossCountry train was hit by a falling tree but nobody was hurt and the passengers were evacuated safely. This occured on the route from Penzance to Plymouth. People travelling on ferry services across the Irish Sea should check with their operator as there are widespread cancellations and it is looking increasingly unlikely that there will be any ferry crossings tomorrow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.transportcentral.co.uk/rail/mass-virgin-west-coast-cancellations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rail Update &#8211; 1 Mar 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.transportcentral.co.uk/rail/rail-update-1-mar-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://www.transportcentral.co.uk/rail/rail-update-1-mar-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 23:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London Midland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virgin Trains]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.transportcentral.co.uk/rail/rail-update-1-mar-2008/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today has not been a good day for travellers on the railway network today with the West Coast Mainline effectively shut down in two major areas resulting in train crews and trains being out of place nationally. The cause of the incidents at Shap between Preston and Carlisle and Hemel Hempstead between Rugby and London [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today has not been a good day for travellers on the railway network today with the West Coast Mainline effectively shut down in two major areas resulting in train crews and trains being out of place nationally.</p>
<p>The cause of the incidents at Shap between Preston and Carlisle and Hemel Hempstead between Rugby and London were both down to freight containers being blown off freight trains. Network Rail expect the line between Preston and Carlisle <a target="_blank" href="http://nationalrail.co.uk/service_bulletins/68cc8a530a04000401323ff8f7c0c974.html">to be shut until Monday morning</a>. The screenshot below is just a short snapshot of the train situation today with trains late up to two hours and more and cancelled.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.transportcentral.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/infrastructureissues.JPG" title="1 Mar 2008 - Network Issues"></a><a href="http://www.transportcentral.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/infrastructureissues.JPG" title="1 Mar 2008 - Network Issues"></a><a href="http://www.transportcentral.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/infrastructureissues.JPG" title="1 Mar 2008 - Network Issues"></a><a href="http://www.transportcentral.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/infrastructureissues.JPG" title="1 Mar 2008 - Network Issues"></a><a href="http://www.transportcentral.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/infrastructureissues.JPG" title="1 Mar 2008 - Network Issues"></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img width="160" src="http://www.transportcentral.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/infrastructureissues.thumbnail.JPG" alt="1 Mar 2008 - Network Issues" height="128" style="width: 215px; height: 166px" /></p>
<p><span id="more-30"></span></p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.virgintrains.co.uk/">Virgin Trains</a> are advising people not to travel unless necessary today and tomorrow there will be continued disruption possible as buses are being run between Preston and Glasgow. However, Virgin Trains say that other operators are accepting tickets for those people booked on their trains.</p>
<p></a>There are further details and a video available on the <a target="_blank" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/7272373.stm">BBC News website</a> which also details a shocking destruction of a container crane at the Port of Felixstowe when a ship became loose from its moorings. Other problems on the network today are:</p>
<ul>
<li>Signalling problems between Poole and Weymouth (TOC: South West Trains)</li>
<li>Landslip between Helensburgh Upper and Garelochhead (TOC: First ScotRail)</li>
<li>Obstruction on the line between St. Albans Abbey and Watford Junction (TOC: London Midland)</li>
<li>Broken down train between Porth and Treherbert (TOC: Arriva Trains Wales)</li>
<li>Overhead wire problems between Audley End and Cambridge (TOC: National Express East Anglia)</li>
<li>Overhead wire problems at Peterborough (TOC: CrossCountry, East Midlands Trains, First Capital Connect, Grand Central, Hull Trains, National Express East Coast)</li>
<li>Tree on the line situated at North Walsham which is situated between Norwich and Sheringham (TOC: National Express East Anglia)</li>
<li>Problem with a river bridge between Oulton Broad South and Lowestoft (TOC: National Express East Anglia)</li>
<li>Tree on the line at Chandlers Ford which is situated between Romsey and Eastleigh (TOC: South West Trains)</li>
</ul>
<p>This has not been a good day for the railway network in Britain but we have to say that when National Rail Enquiries detail issues as big as the effective closure of the West Coast Mainline as simply an &#8220;obstruction on the line&#8221; it is just so woefully inadequate.</p>
<p>One of the major complaints from passengers today was the usual: complete lack of information. Information is the key to restoring public trust but it is sadly not paramount to the operators of the railway network in times of crisis it seems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.transportcentral.co.uk/rail/rail-update-1-mar-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

